WPC1,Global Peacemaking midtermi WP_TV03640767.5.4s(USA)ntrefssWPTVWPC2LA9z GoalsWPD2WPC2@ Q" 8pxxp8p8p8p8p8xx8p<888pppppxp?ppp?<xppppp88<8pxxp8p8p8p8p8xx8p<<8pxxp8p8p8p8p8p8xx8p<?pppppxp?ppp<8pxxp8p8p8p8p8xx8p<pppp08>>"=+30"=(#100"=(#200"=(#300"n=(s#400"O=(T#500"/=(4#600 .<=20><wwwwww1Ef1Fewwwwww1n1owwwwww1/1wwwwww1ff1wwwwww1L ˙1M wwwwww183192 G /=/<!<!=!/=+'15th))16th))17th))18th))19th))20thAT T!5T!5!I â RЫ4] ]4 4]2e, Geneva +!(Average Duration of Conflicts by Century20e+9Three COW-type Datasets  (#Mean Duration in Years 4]11%  < 8<p8pp88p08pp8pp8pp8 p`8c 88 8p" ? Rcp@ppp08 @   ?8q xp@ p p8x p88@p88p88 p8 88@<x     >|x`@<8  ?<x8pppp0p88  ; 8 8 8>p <  ?<x@pppppp888  ?  p  < 8p xx8p8 p8p8p8 p8 xx 8p <p   8 8 8 8p08 p8 p8 p8 p8 px px  pppp8  ( ? 8q xp ppp8x p88 p88 p88 p88 88 <x  0 ppppp08 pp88888x@?><8pxxp8p8p8p8p8p8p8p8p8 ?<x p ppp p8 8-n          ? 8q xp p p8x p88 p88 p88 p8 88 <x - n      i r    n>n:|nx`@@:n@<.(z<(zn   ?n<x(pzp<p(ppz88n n  n:N@n 8 8( 8n<(n<(n<nBn B n ?<<xpnppBppn88Bn<   nJ n  J V <( 8pn xx< p8( p8 p8J p8 p8n xx 8pJ <  |  dn8 88F0 p8n p8< p8 p8px p .  @ppp    ?< 8q xpn p p8xn p88 p88np88 p888 <x 2  < npp'p p08   ud 0  Epp88.888x   ln ?. 8 n  n > < 8p xxn p8h p8. p88 p8 p8 p8C p8 p8n p8|   <n.8 n .< <  ?@<nx$pp@ppnp8 8    n   ?e8q xp8 p p8x. p88 p88< p88 p8 88 <x@  l R.  k  8pxx p8 p8 p8P p8 p8 xx 8p<    `@ 88 8  `4u @ Pppp|ppPxpP ? zpppP $ ?<xpprpppP88} v`  `  < 8pxx p8p8 p8` p8 p8` xx 8p~ <   |` ~ <x8p xxe p8q p8) p8 p8 p8) p8d xx|8p<  ` @ p ?@@@@pppppxp n? `ppppDJ  n   <p 8p xx4 p8 p8 p8. p8. p8 xx 8pH < @ .     ).nCpppp08  n dR V n . `| >`>`2"7+ H20"7(#30"7(#40"7(#50"7(#60"7(#70"7(#80"l7(q#90"T7(Y100"=7(B110"&7(+120 %6:2'89"7:########### ## ### ############(############### ###3###<#!#####}## ;E &7&9!9!7!&7"7+ 1400"b)+1500")+1600")+1700")+1800")+1900"9)+2000(6YearAT E!DE!D!zz TE ET  TE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+ZEurope  (Number of Conflicts  TEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8   pppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1"(7+,0"7"7(#10"7"7(#20"7"7(#30"7"n7(s#40"W7"@7(E#50 ?6):2A8(9"S7o####### ##!########/######## ###=###/#########3####E###%####t##7#*####  TE @7@9!(9!(7!@7"(7+1400"(b)+1500"()+1600"()+1700"()+1800"()+1900"(9)+2000(PYearAT 44E!^E!^!4Rz T hET  TE2 TE, TE ET TE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+ZAfrica  (Number of Conflicts TEb1b1 @ <8<p8pp88p08pp8pp8pp8p`8888p?0 p8$p8p8p8pxpppp>8pxxp8p8p8p8 p8Qxx8p <8 8 8 }pppppxp?ppp ?<xppppp888  8    < 8p xxp8 p8 p8x p8< p8xxx 8pp<  8 8  < 8p xx p8 p8p8 p8p8 p8 xx88p <p  p?88p0p8pp8ppxp ?x pppx  ]  q< 8p xxp8 p88p8 p8p8xx 8p <    8pppp08@B D F HJLNPR T V XZ[p]p_8a8c8e8g8ixkm o q suwy{}   >   >>   "(7+,0" 7(#10"7(#20"7(#30"7(#40"7(#50"z7(#60"]7(b#70"@7(E#80 ?6):2A8(9"#7### #### ###################### ######## ############I# #\#####Q## TE @7@9!(9!(7!@7"(7+1400"(b)+1500"()+1600"()+1700"()+1800"()+1900"(9)+2000(PYearAT 44E!^E!^!4R+14"(bh500"()+1600()+1700"(TE800"jj PE EP  PE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+:Western Europe  (Number of Conflicts  PEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8  p@ppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1""7+)0"7()5"7(#10"7(#15"7(#20"f7(k#25"@7(E#30 ?6#:2A8"9"@7b#=###&##%###=#######D#########&###<###-#########&####j###-####%##Z#####  PE @7@9!"9!"7!@7""7+1400""b)+1500"")+1600"")+1700"")+1800"")+1900""9)+2000(JYearAT 44E!XE!X!4Rj P߰ hEP  PE2 PE, nn TE ET  TE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+<Eastern Europe  (Number of Conflicts  TEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8  p@ppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1"(7+,0"7()5"7(#10"7(#15"7(#20"g7(l#25"@7(E#30 ?6):2A8(9"7U#######M######/##'##e####/#######&#####'#######.#########!@!###6####  TE @7@9!(9!(7!@7"(7+1400"(b)+1500"()+1600"()+1700"()+1800"()+1900"(9)+2000(PYearAT 44E!^E!^!4RTQvP1PIChPICTHPICTQPICT-PICT  TEhWjjVE EV VE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+D North Africa  (Number of Conflicts VEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8  p@ppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1"(7+,0"7()2"7()4"7()6"7()8"g7(l#10"@7(E#12 ?6):2A8(9"7#:##&#######'##:###:########M###:##M####&######&#####t#'#!g#:##:#!#`#!T##!,##: VE @7@9!(9!(7!@7"(7+1400"(b)+1500"()+1600"()+1700"()+1800"()+1900"(9)+2000(PYearAT 44E!^E!^!4rr UE EU  UE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+"West & Central Africa  (Number of Conflicts  UEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8  p@ppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1"(7+,0"7()5"7(#10"7(#15"7(#20"g7(l#25"@7(E#30 ?6):2A8(9"(7################################'##############/####U!(#####M##  UE @7@9!(9!(7!@7"(7+1400"(b)+1500"()+1600"()+1700"()+1800"()+1900"(9)+2000(PYearAT 44E!^E!^!4R)+180w()+h0"(9)+2000(PYear UE44TE ET TE2e, Geneva .+DNumber of Conflicts per Decade20e+*East & South Africa  (Number of Conflicts TEb1b1 #@  ' ) <+ 8<- p8p/ p881 p083 pp85 pp87 pp8" p`8: 88< 8p> ?@ B DFHJ0L p8N p8P p8R p8T pxV pX Z [ ]p_papceg i k >m 8po xxq p8s p8u p8w p8y p8{ xx} 8p <     8 8 8  p@ppppxp*  ? ppp   ?<xppppp88       < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    !# % ' ) <+ 8p- xx/ p81 p82 p84 p86 p88 p8: xx< 8p> <@ B D F H J ?LNPRTVXZ\^`acegpipkpmpopqxps u ?w yp{p}p     < 8p xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <    pppAp08       @ B D ?5|GxIpKpMpO0Q8SUW Y [ ?]|_xapcpepg8i8kmo q s uwy/|~   pp88888x   -   >   >>   1""7+)0"7( )5"7(#10"7(#15"7(#20"7(#25"x7(}#30"\7(a#35"@7(E#40 ?6#:2A8"9""7## ##################### ######"##### ######### ######|##-### ##8#"# TE @7@9!"9!"7!@7""7+1400""b)+1500"")+1600"")+1700"")+1800"")+1900""9)+2000(JYearAT 44E!XE!X!4RTy hET TE2TE, RROG GO OG2e, Geneva .+mNumber of Conflicts20e*by Duration in Years  (Number of Conflicts OGb1b1   ~ `< 8<` p8p p88`p08 pp8` pp8f pp8`p`888 8p? 0p8p8p8 p8` px p`  8 p"pp,`   > 8pxx p8p8 p8` p8 p8xx8p< `  ` 8 8 8t`|`pppppxp ` ?2 pp`p@`#`   ?<xpp#ppp`88   P` P  `< 8pP xx p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <        < 8p xx p8 p8` p8 p8 p8 p8 xx 8p <^    @ <?`` `d p`pp`ppxp ` ?w `pwpp``  P   <w 8p xx p8p8p8p8 p8` xx 8pP < ( A  BCCBABA pp|pp08`P  `P `     >uR0Vh> 0 R F8""=+)0"="=(#500"="=(1000"="`=(e1500"@= ?<#@2A>"?1_=a?"_= w1IK# $1VX# 1 ce# 1pr# 1}# 1# 1# 1# 1 # 1!# 1!# 1!# 1 "# 1!## 1!## 1" $ # 1"$# 1"%$'# 1"2$4# 1"?$A# OG @=@?!"?!"=!@=""=+0""]""~)A5"""")=10"""")A15""""?)@20(JDuration in YearsAT 44K!XK!X!4R44EE!XhRTy OGET}9 9} }92e, Geneva .+3#Number of Conflicts in 20th Century20e+Civil vs Interstate Conflicts""+ ('0"+(20"+(40"x+(}60"@+(E80 ?*#.2A,"-"+#+#####]##"+#>#####<## }9 @+@-!"-!"+!@+""++1900""l)A1925"")@1950"")A1975""-)@2000(JYearAT 449!X9!X!4"e(g*Civil"u* InterstateAT"Xb#*##R-GPICPICTD PICTPICT"PICTiPICTG}9vPICPICT-GPICTBPICTXe PICTPICT"PICTiPICTGPICTQvPICT1PICTOPICTHPICTQPICT-PICT DPICThPICTF/WBFNF/PICT j\b( Co p t``?@????@???+p??@?P{Po__wwPwPPBP^o0.p}so.{.߽߽}/@}/ ` u_}1` {`Ͽw 33@3344@N4 4R3.5.2'3.5.2, 1996 Corel Corporation Limited,R3.5.2Created with WordPerfect 3.5.2.)#!CxHH(FG(HH(d}`P4(f^ PJobbTStlnversStylPSetSTR WBOX WBFN RMMTwPrvWDat*PtPt6K,WrRG*x1 uJ DrR S,#  K -G + !F|y 0GF/ AIs PI^ `G" oH4 SH$ HU G UH(b@ AFt6- Fp + 0Fy A}Fds `_H ^ o9I" ~G4 GU G Ib@ ΗG6- GMGR{WP}11{WP}10{WP}01{WP}01{WP}10{WP}11{WP}12{WP}22'  '!{WP}10<Px2K} <<KK ..,,..,,۪Ы#!"New Century Schlbk#'  ' uοViolent Conflicts 1400 A.D. to the Present 'in Different Regions of the World$'4'  '$!̿êЫ04A44'  '0ܲANΪЫPeter BreckeN[eThe Sam Nunn School of International Affairs[hGeorgia Institute of Technology!̳ huAtlanta, GA 303320610  u  peter.brecke@inta.gatech.edu  ܪЫ   Paper prepared for the 1999 Meeting of the Peace Science Society (International)on October 810, 1999 in Ann Arbor, Michigan.ABSTRACTܲThis paper argues that we can improve our theorizing about violent conflict bymore finely delineating the types of conflicts that occur. To that end the paperfirst argues for the necessity of a taxonomy of violent conflicts. It then describesthe Conflict Catalog, a listing of all recorded violent conflicts that meet'  'Richardsons magnitude 1.5 or higher criterion (32 or more deaths). The paper88'  'presents inprogress findings from the catalog and compares them againstanalogous results from earlier compilations of violent conflicts. It !t!also presentsmore detailed findings from the 5 regions (of 12) for which the list of conflicts isapproaching completion. Among the findings highlighted is the widespreadpeacefulness of the 18th century. !̳!̳ ܪ !  Geneva ЫINTRODUCTION!"The classical and still dominant approach to the study of warfare consists ofdetailed description and intensive analysis of one or a few wars. A comparativelysmall subset of researchers has taken the approach of answering theoreticalquestions about warfare on the basis of many wars (for example, Blainey, 1973;Geller and Singer, 1998; Luard, 1987; Holsti, 1991). Despite true progress by thisgroup in contributing to our understanding of war, the pace of that progress hasnot been as we would like. The problem lies not in the alleged loss ofunderstanding of wars caused by having to work with so many of them with just a'  'superficial understanding of each. The real problem in my opinion is that weN"" ""++ h'  'Nhave so little systematically collected data about most violent conflicts.!,{WP}11  1   w!00 '  '!{WP}10<Px2K} <<KK  #!"New Century Schlbk#1. The term violent conflict is defined more fully later in the paper. At this point it is sufficient to'  'note that violent conflict is a more general term than war or armed conflict as they are typicallyused in the research literature (Small and Singer, 1982; Kende, 1979; Bouthoul and Carrere, 1978,or Wallensteen and Sollenberg, 1996). 0w֭ Even basic?'  'characteristics such as the number of major actors or the duration of the conflictcannot be found in one or a few easily accessible locations except for a relativelysmall number of conflicts that are enumerated in the Correlates of War andrelated datasets. If one wishes to conduct empirical research concerning thelarge population of violent conflicts not included in that family of datasets, dataabout those conflicts are simply not readily available.23There is a second problem related to that first problem. Finding the causes andfrom that the harbingers of violent conflicts may progress faster if we more finelydistinguish between different types of conflict and search for the causes of each'  'type. Midlarsky (1989) alludes to this problem in his introduction to Handbook of'  'War Studies where he states, Although the treatment of war as a generic'  'category has proven useful until now, future research may require the systematicdelineation among several categories, each of which may require a separatetheoretical treatment. (p. xviii). Making such a delineation with a firmempirical basis requires assembling data about the conflicts to be categorized, andup to this point those data are scattered across a large number of sources. =)>)6To acquire a sense of the scope of the phenomenon to be categorized or delineated,I made a quick and surely not exhaustive compilation of types of violent conflictsthat various authors have referred to in their writings. That search found 145different types of violent conflict (Brecke, 1997). Even though a number of theterms refer to the same or essentially the same thing and are primarily attemptsby different writers to use slightly different wording for varietys sake, the listillustrated the enormous"even daunting"array of ways in which violent conflictmanifests itself. F6GThe variety turns out to be only part of the problem. Worse is that many, evenmost, of these types of conflict are not clearly specified. We possess criteria withwhich to consistently allocate particular conflicts to only the crudest categoriessuch as interstate war versus civil war. For more discriminating delineationsthere exist no agreedupon characteristics to define them other than things like apeasant revolt is one in which peasants are the main group fighting against theauthorities. A categorization of violent conflicts that is empirically grounded isthe way to get past that problem. With a taxonomy"a categorization system thatis empiricallybased as opposed to being a conceptual scheme"we can say withconfidence that a conflict of type A possesses characteristics X,Y, and Z. Much more importantly, we can consistently identify the set of conflicts of type Afrom a population of conflicts. The ability to make statements of this sort has tworelated benefits. TTJUTa T*UBa hJFirst, theoretical and empirical work to find the causes of violent conflict canconsciously focus on very particular types of conflict (more particular than at'  'present) and use very specific examples as the appropriate empirical domain. More importantly for the broader discipline, evaluation of individual researchprojects with respect to each other will become easier because how they differfrom each other in terms of subject matter and empirical grounding will beclearer than it is currently. \q]Second, for the related task of trying to find conflict early warning indicators, wecan specify that particular combinations of indicators are precursors to specifictypes of conflicts (that are defined as types by particular combinations of variablesembodying their characteristics). In other words, preconflict situations can bedefined in terms of specific combinations of independent variables while theconflicts they precede can be defined in terms of specific combinations ofdependent variables (Ragin, 1987). With the ability to define the conflict earlywarning problem in this manner, we can reduce if not eliminate the currentproblem of trying to find consistent early warning indicators for widely disparateconflicts that have been lumped together because there is no system for preciselydifferentiating them (Brecke, 1998). hhihuConsequently, the goal of this effort is to assemble a dataset that can support thedevelopment of a coherent schema, a taxonomy, that orders, differentiates, andrelates violent conflicts.lum+nCOMPONENTS OF A TAXONOMIC APPROACHo pTo create a taxonomy of violent conflicts, three main tasks must be completed. The first is to define the population of violent conflicts to be categorized andassemble a sample of that population. The second task is to define the set ofvariables by which the conflicts can be grouped and differentiated and then todetermine for each of the conflicts its value with respect to each of those variables. Both of these tasks are data collection intensive, but they are necessary to build thedataset the third task needs. The third task is to apply clustering techniques tothe dataset to find groupings and from that types of violent conflicts. Theremainder of this paper will concentrate on the first task. yE zER!cViolent Conflicts {R_ |_lIn this project the term violent conflict is used as shorthand for violent politicalconflict. CioffiRevillas definition of war for his LORANOW project serves as thedefinition of violent conflict for this project:l$'  '$$A war (a war event) is an occurrence of purposive and lethal/'  'violence among two or more social groups pursuing conflictingpolitical goals that results in fatalities, with at least one belligerent'  'group organized under the command of authoritative leadership.NV V/ h'  'N(CioffiRevilla, 1996:8) #l#$'  '$This definition combines sufficient generality such that it encompasses a widevariety of types of violent conflict yet at the same time distinguishes violent conflictfrom other forms of lethal violence such as mob lynchings, gang turf battles, andorganized crime vendettas. The line between violent conflict and other forms oflethal violence may be fuzzy at times, but in practice they will probably seldom beconfused. While using the term war instead of violent conflict has some appealbecause while a gang turf battle, for instance, can be considered to be a violentconflict, war for many researchers has come to mean a violent conflict withspecific properties such as that there have been more than 1000 battlerelateddeaths. A satisfactory term is difficult; violent political conflict is too wordy andwar has certain connotations for some researchers. Despite its faults, violentconflict is used. (ث)ثConditions applied to define wars (Singer and Small, 1972) or armed conflicts(Wallensteen and Sollenberg, 1996) such as that at least one group be agovernment of a state or that all opposing sides be armed or that only battlefielddeaths matter for the determination do not apply to the definition of violentconflicts. Consequently, situations such as massacres of unarmed civilians orterritorial conflicts between warlords when there is no state involvement qualifyas violent conflicts.Task 1: Assemble The Sample of Violent Conflicts)The potential population of violent conflicts for the construction of a taxonomy isall violent conflicts at any location in the world since 1400 AD in which 32 or morepersons have died because of the conflict within the span of a year. Multiyearconflicts are defined by consecutive years in which that threshold of deaths issurpassed. The 32person threshold makes the population of conflicts correspondto conflicts of magnitude 1.5 or higher according to the Richardson (1960) scale. The magnitude value is the base ten logarithm of the number of people who died;the base ten logarithm of 31.62 is 1.5. The 1400 AD temporal thresholdcorresponds to the one set by Luard (1987), lies between major dates for Chinese(1366) and European and American (1492) populations, and demarcates a pointbefore which the quality and extent of data about many parts of the world drops offprecipitously. )$ '  '$Obviously, the sample of cases for which data can be collected is significantly'  'smaller than the population, particularly for conflicts in which the number offatalities is towards the lower end of the range, for conflicts further back in time,and for parts of the world where written records are not readily available,especially for earlier times. Nevertheless, this population has been set as a goalbecause:   1)$A surprisingly large amount of data for this population of conflicts alreadyexists, albeit in widely scattered sources with only a modest degree ofoverlap.U  Gl :V/ G hU2)$With the large sample size that can be gathered from this population, weobtain wide variation in the types of conflict and their characteristics while'  'at the same time have the possibility of having a significant number ofexamples for each type, especially in more general, higherlevel groupings. The greatly expanded number of cases made available for statisticalanalysis will almost certainly reveal new relationships that can contributeto our understanding of the causes of different types of violent conflict.# W l#+3)$At a more practical level, when extracting conflicts from existingcompilations that do not supply fatality figures, it is in many instancesdifficult to separate those conflicts that have, say, 45 fatalities from thosethat have 110 fatalities or 350 fatalities until additional sources have beenaccessed. The marginal additional effort to use the lower threshold is thusminimal, and may even be negative, because the additional sources do nothave to be sought in the making of the list of conflicts./ l'  '/0  '  '01The Conflict Catalog0  ' '  '0 ' 4The Conflict Catalog contains the sample of conflicts that provides the basis for ataxonomy of violent conflicts. It is a computerized dataset that contains asuperset of all extant compilations of violent conflicts that have been identified atthis time. Assembly of the Conflict Catalog began in 1996 by combining theconflicts from existing computerized war datasets such as Correlates Of War(Small and Singer, 1982), Militarized Interstate Disputes (Jones, Bremer, andSinger, 1996), Great Power Wars (Levy, 1983) and MajorMinor Power Wars(Midlarsky, 1988). From there I added additional conflicts from Richardson(1960), Wright (1965), Sorokin (1937), Luard (1987), and Holsti (1991). Furtherresearch has unearthed a large number of other sources containing a plethora ofconflicts not listed in those nine sources. In fact, a brief perusal of the additionalsources indicates that those nine sources combined contain perhaps one third ofthe conflicts contained in the entire set of sources that have been identified at thistime. (See Appendix A for a listing of conflict compilations that have been'  'identified and in some instances used thus far.)!,{WP}11  2   !<< '  '!{WP}10<Px2K} <<KK  #!"New Century Schlbk#3. One massive compilation among these additional sources never cited is that of Sutton (1972a;'  '1972b). He attempted to assemble in one place all violent conflicts from 1820 to 1970 in which morethan 20 people were killed in order to provide a strong, comprehensive foundation for an empiricalanalysis of war. Amazingly, he never followed through to get that enormous effort published, andthe voluminous manuscripts languish at the Hoover Institution Archives at Stanford.<֭0 4  '  '0 The sources that have been identified are quite varied in nature. They range fromacademic research manuscripts to encyclopedias by military historians tohistorical atlases to historical chronologies. Notable about the Conflict Catalog isthat it employs sources produced in other regions of the world that are not inEnglish or other West European languages. The most important of these aremajor Chinese, Japanese, and Russian compilations that are essentiallyequivalent to what has been produced by military historians in the West exceptthat they include many violent conflicts overlooked by Europeans and North6 _)N  h6Americans. In practical terms, the only conflicts not included from previouscompilations (with only a small number of exceptions where it is known that less'  'than 32 people were killed) are those that occurred before 1400 AD.   The Conflict Catalog as of this writing contains 3213 violent conflicts. Theprimary information about each conflict in the Conflict Catalog at this time is very'  'simple: Who, when,where, and common name (if one exists) and variables N'  'derived from that information. The derived variables are: The number of majoractors in the conflict, the duration of the conflict in years, and the duration of theconflict in months (when that can be calculated). For some of the conflicts, 1075 ofthem to be precise, information regarding the number of fatalities has beenadded. Over time, the number of conflicts possessing this piece of informationwill expand as I begin to use more focused historical materials. As this projectprogresses, the violent conflicts found in the additional sources is being added tothe Conflict Catalog. If more sources are found, they will be used. Most new'  'sources are likely to not be in the English language. The expected number of ?'  'conflicts in the Conflict Catalog when the additional sources have been tapped isbetween 4000 and 4500. A worksheet for documenting the values of the variablesfor each of the conflicts in the Conflict Catalog has been developed and is beingused.  Interim Findings from the Conflict Catalog  This section presents findings from the Conflict Catalog in its current state. Thecatalog is quite complete with respect to five regions of the world: Western Europe,Eastern Europe, North Africa, West & Central Africa, and East & South Africa forit is unlikely that many additional conflicts will be found for these regions. European conflicts are comparatively so well documented that it is improbablethat very many have escaped inclusion in one compilation or another. On theother hand, identifying additional African conflicts would entail a monumentaleffort.    This presentation of interim findings has two purposes. First, it portrayscharacteristics of violent conflict in the past 600 years and in the process raisesquestions about the received wisdom regarding violent conflict that we haveaccepted from earlier, more limited samples. Second, it provides a justificationfor the tasks described below.   ]  ] jIf the 3213 conflicts currently in the dataset are broken down according to thedecade in which they began, as is done in Figure 1, one finds a rather interestingpattern. The number of conflicts dips markedly starting in the mid1600s andremains at a reduced level for almost a century before rising sharply in the 19thand 20th centuries. Of note is that the worst decades in terms of new conflictsare the 1890s, 1910s, and 1960s with between 110 and 120 new conflicts for each ofthose decades.   j   As one would expect, different regions show different patterns than the global6 V/  h6total. Figures 2 and 3 present the 600year patterns for Europe and Africa,respectively. The two continents exhibit markedly different trends. Europe'  'experienced a general decline while Africas experience was that of a slowincrease until the 19th century when European imperial expansion created asharp spike peaking in the 1890s followed by a second, smaller spike in the 1960s. It must be noted that it is possible that the number of conflicts in Africa prior to1800 was significantly higher than presented in Figure 3. However, given the lowpopulation densities in Africa during that period, it is unlikely that thediscrepancy is so large that the general trend portrayed in that figure is incorrect.  ddqq~ΪЫ~l   hD~'  'l0'  '0V! =:F/D=:D~VFIGURE 1$$*$$*$$ܪЫ $$ !$$ "*$$ #*7$$ $7D$$ %DQ$$&Q^$$'^k$$(kx$$)x$$*$$+$$,$$-$$.$$/$$0$$ 1$$2$$3$$4$$5!$$6!. !y6. D~ h i'  '07>K>'  '0ΪЫFIGURE 28KXܪЫ9Xe:er;r<=>$|$ ?$|$ @$|$ A$|$ B$|$ C$|$V!:Rsi:RiVD$|$E$|$F$|$G$|$H($|$I(5 (I 5  i h ]'  'V!HU=S^]=S]V0J  '  '0ΪЫFIGURE 3K#ܪЫL#0M0=N=JOJWPWd$$Qdq$$ Rq~$$ S~$$ T$$z U  U   ] hzSo that we may see the geographic breakdown of conflicts, each conflict has been'  'coded as to where it occurred (or at least primarily occurred) in one of 12 regions. The regions and their approximate extent on a current map are:XY1.North America, Central America, and the CaribbeanZ 2.South America[ 3.Europe west of 15 degrees east longitude plus Sweden and Italy\$4.$Europe east of 15 degrees east longitude (includes Caucusus region)#]$1l#5.Middle East (Iran west to Syria and Arabian peninsula)^1>6.$North Africa (Egypt to Morocco and Mauritania east to Sudan)#_>Kl#7.West & Central Africa (Senegal to Congo) `KX8.$East & South Africa (Ethiopia to Zambia to Angola and south)# aXel#9.Central Asia (Afghanistan, former Soviet republics, and Siberia) ber10.South Asia cr11$Southeast Asia (Burma to Australia and Pacific islands)# dl#112.East Asia (China, Korea, Japan)efOther regional breakdowns are, of course, possible. This particular set of regionswas selected as a tradeoff between precision in location, concordance withregional studies breakdowns, and comprehensibility in graphics.ijOne of the early findings of this research effort was that if one restricts oneself tothe nine original data sources mentioned earlier, one discovers a strongEurocentric bias in the data, and an especially stark bias for the period prior to1800. The Conflict Catalog attempts to at least in part correct this disparity as itmoves towards completion. Fortunately, many of the sources identified inAppendix A will fill the voids for the different regions. Given that the ConflictCatalog is expected to grow by 10001300 conflicts from those sources, we canexpect to see a much more even distribution across regions over time.rBsBOThe continentlevel breakdown presented above can be further extended. Figures4 and 5 portray the number of conflicts in Western and Eastern Europe,respectively, while Figures 6, 7, and 8 delineate the comparable trends for NorthAfrica, West & Central Africa, and East & South Africa, respectively.lwO v"w  h >'  'l0x'  '0qyΪЫFIGURE 4zܪЫ{$$|$$V!A;N">;N>V}$$~$$K$$ $$ $$ "$$ "/$$ /<$$<I$$IV$$Vc$$cp$$p}$$}$$$$$$$$$$*ΪЫ$$*$$* E   > :h O'  '0/</'  '0<IFIGURE 5IVܪЫVccpp}$y$}$y$rqV!Hq[;R4O;ROV$y$ $y$ $y$ $y$ $y$ $y$$y$$y$$y$ $y$ $y$&$y$&3$y$3@$y$@M$y$MZ$y$Zg$y$&ΪЫgt$y$ܪЫt$y$$y$$y$$y$$y$q    O h5'  '0'  '0ΪЫFIGURE 6ܪЫV!Hc'>U5>U5V$$!$$!.$$.;$$;H$$ HU$$ Ub$$ bo$$ o|$$ |$$$$$$$$$$$$q$$$$$$$$ $$ $$%$$%2$$2?$$?L$$LY$$Yf Yyf 5 h5'  'ΪЫFIGURE 70zz'  '0ܪЫV!H ;SU5;S5V  5 ah+}'  'ΪЫFIGURE 80'  '0ܪЫV!H =R+=R+}Vz,  , +} chzOf note is the stark contrast in the longterm trends. The number of conflicts'  'declines in a clear and rather consistent manner in Western Europe while the '  'decline for Eastern Europe is much less pronounced and even uncertain. North Africa displays a fairly consistent rise in the number of conflicts until the20th century when there is a rather vague indication that the rise is over and theubiquity of conflicts may even be declining. West & Central Africa is dominated bythe surge of conflicts associated with European colonial expansion beginning inthe 1840s and the subsequent spurt of conflicts associated with decolonization inthe 1960s. East & South Africa, like West & Central Africa, evinces the doublespikes associated with the colonialization and decolonialization processes, and,like Europe and North Africa, apparently experienced a relatively peaceful 18thcentury compared to the surrounding periods of time. HHUThe relatively pacific 18th century is a puzzle. Comparably thorough data forother regions have not yet been entered into the dataset, but my translators for theChinese and Japanese data have without knowing these findings commented tome that the 18th century had relatively few conflicts in those two welldocumentedcountries. One has to wonder why that century is so different. The explanationmay be particularly interesting as the phenomenon is global in scale, whichwould imply that the cause must be global in scale as well. One individualproposed to me that climate change may be the explanatory variable. Namely,there may be a relationship between global temperatures and conflicts operatingthrough an intermediary variable such as food production. Unfortunately, thecorrelation between global temperatures 1400 AD to the present and the number ofconflicts for that time frame is .1152. U$'  '$qIn his analysis of Richardsons Statistics of Deadly Quarrels (1960), Wilkinson_'  '(1980) examined the distribution of war durations in Richardsons dataset. Following a comment by Richardson, Wilkinson tested whether a (declining)geometric progression fit the data. The idea was that short wars would be themost numerous and that longer wars would be progressively and proportionatelyless common with the number of very long wars dwindling towards zero. Wilkinson did not find a good fit. I (using the JMP statistical package) sortedRichardsons wars by their duration in years and plotted the number of wars ateach duration value. From that plot (not presented here) it is easy to see why thefit was disappointing. However, when I performed the same operations on theConflict Catalog, Figure 9 resulted. Except for a small bump at 8 years, the plotserves as an almost textbook example of a curve smoothly and proportionatelydeclining towards zero. qAs stated earlier, a primary motivation for this project is to establish a newcategorization system for violent conflicts. One outcome we can expect fromhaving such a classification system is that over time and across the globe weshould see differences in the prevalence of different types of conflict. Thoseprevalences should reflect the different circumstances of the times and localesand should be related to other processes such as the expansion of the world6 V/  h6economy or decolonization.  $  ,'  '$A hint of what this will look like can be seen in Figure 10, which portrays for the20th century conflicts in the Conflict Catalog into whether they were betweenunits exercising effective sovereignty (essentially interstate wars) or they werewithin units exercising effective sovereignty (essentially civil wars). Figure 10summarizes that breakdown over time. Notable is that the two types of conflictare approximately equally numerous for the first half of the century, but then civilwars come to dominate. It will be interesting to see how the pattern evolves whenthe distinction is extended back to earlier centuries. ,  l   h I'  'l0  '  '0ΪЫFIGURE 9 ܪЫ    $$ ! $$! !$$!!&$$ !&!3$$ !3!@$$ !@!M$$ !M!Z$$ !Z!g$$!g!t$$!t!$$!!$$!!$$ !!$$!!!$$"!!$$#!!$$$!!$$%!!$$&!!$$'!"$$V! E ANb@IANIV(""$$)""$$+*""*$$' '+!" Helvetica+"*"8"*l "*l+"8  I h' '$,"e"s'  '$ΪHH$$Ы#!"New Century Schlbk#Figure 100-"s""s'  '0$.""'y|'$NV! ( 7|6-7|(HV0/"$ "('  '00$ $1$$#J2$#$0 $#2$0 DJA number of analysts such as Blainey (1973) and Eckhardt (1992) have made the'  'observation that the average duration of wars has decreased over time. Figure 11, which presents the average duration of conflicts by century for the three COW  based datasets, depicts a clear and rather interesting pattern. The average duration clearly declined from the 17th to the 20th centuries, but intriguingly,those datasets also indicate that the duration increased from the 15th to the 17th centuries. Blainey offers a number of explanations for changes in the average&duration of wars, and a future paper will explore the validity of thoseexplanations.  ;$@$<$$ Finally, Figure 12 presents the average duration of conflicts by century for thecomplete set of conflicts in the Conflict Catalog. After a drop from the 15th to the16th century, the average duration of violent conflicts remained remarkablysteady for four centuries before rising somewhat in the 20th century. SinceFigure 11 portrays a declining duration for large interstate conflicts, thedifference between Figures 11 and 12 implies that at least some other types ofconflicts have become on average longer or that new types of conflict have emerged that have a longer average duration than the average duration for all types of violent conflict. This result is an argument in favor of the creation of a'  'gnew classification system for violent conflicts.!"Genevax F$%D%7 %7F%D D b~' 'x0G%T%d%T' '0H%d%tʀV!x  X3 +b~X3b~VFIGURE 11I%t%ܪЫJ%%K%%L%%$$M%%$$N%%$$ O%%$$ P%%$$ Q%&$$ R&&$$ S&&$$$T&$&4$$U&4&D$$V&D&T$$W&T&d$$X&d&t$$Y&t&$$Z&&$$[&&$$\&&$$]&&$$^&&$$_&&$$`&&a&'b'' 'b'  b~ D 3wU' '0c'$'4'$' '0ʀΪЫFIGURE 12d'4'DܪЫe'D'T$$f'T'd$$V!h @ R"y3wR"3wUVg'd't$$h't'$$i''$$j''$$ k''$$ l''$$ m''$$ n''$$ o''$$p'($$q(($$r(($$$s($(4$$t(4(D$$u(D(T$$v(T(d$$w(d(t$$x(t(y((z((`{(( ({(  3wU D`$|(('  '$#!"New Century Schlbk#CONCLUSION0}((('  '0~((The Conflict Catalog being developed in this project will greatly expand the set ofviolent conflicts available for analysis by researchers in the field of internationaland comparative politics, political sociology, and political geography. Thismanuscript has described how it can serve as the foundation for an empirically  based categorization of violent conflicts. The resulting list of sharedcharacteristics held by different groups of conflicts will help researcherssearching for the causes of war by giving them both more precise definitions of thetraits of violent conflicts and distinct sets of conflicts on which they canconcentrate their empirical research. In addition, the data gathered for theConflict Catalog, while intended primarily for the problem of developing a violentconflict taxonomy, will almost certainly turn out to be useful for examining alarge number of other questions about violent conflicts.$ ()' '$!"Genevab))) )) D' 'bĀΪЫ #!"New Century Schlbk#ѲAppendix A0)))' '0$))' '$Compilations of Violent Conflicts 0))) '  '0ܪЫ$))'  '$Dictionaries or Encyclopedias of Wars and Battles0)))='  '0)*Brownstone, David F. and Irene Franck. Timelines of War: A Chronology ofWarfare from 100,000 B.C to the Present. New York: Little, Brown & Company.1996.**(*(*5Bruce, George. Collins Dictionary of Wars. Glasgow: Harper Collins. 1995. *5*B(this was formerly Harbottles Dictionary of Battles, 1966, 1971, 1981 and ThePaladin Dictionary of Battles, 1986) *B*\ *\*iChandler, David. Dictionary of Battles: the worlds key battles from 405 BC totoday. New York: Random House. 1991. *i* **Clodfelter, Micheal. Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference toCasualty and Other Figures, 16181991. Vols. 1 and 2. Jefferson, North Carolina:McFarland & Company, Inc.. 1992.****Davis, Paul K. Encyclopedia of Invasions and Conquests: from Ancient Times tothe Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABCClio. 1996.****Dupuy, Trevor N., and R. Ernest Dupuy. The Harper Encyclopedia of MilitaryHistory from 3500 B.C. to the present. 4th edition. New York: Harper & Row. 1993.*+++Eggenberger, David. An Encyclopedia of Battles: accounts of over 1,560 battlesfrom 1479 B.C. to the present. New York: Dover. 1985.++,(this was formerly A Dictionary of Battles, 1967)+,+9+9+FGallay, Allan. Colonial Wars of North America: an encyclopedia, Military Historyof the United States series, Vol. No. 5. New York: Garland, 1996.+F+`+`+mGoldstein, Erik. Wars and Peace Treaties: 18161991. New York: Routledge. 1992.+m+z+z+Hogg, Ian. V. Battles: A concise dictionary. New York: Harcourt Brace. 1995.++++Keenan, Jerry. Encyclopedia of American Indian Wars: 14921890. SantaBarbara, CA: ABCClio. 1997.++++Kohn, George C. Dictionary of Wars. Garden City, N.Y.: AnchorPress/Doubleday, 1987.++ ++Laffin, John. Brasseys Battles: 3,500 years of conflict, campaigns, and!++wars from AZ. Washington, D.C.: Brassey's Defence Publishers, 1986."+, $#, ,'  '$ Sweetman, John. A Dictionary of European Land Battles: from the Earliest,l'  'Times to 1945. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company. 1985.$,,0$%,0,='  '$ Van Creveld, Martin. The Encyclopedia of Revolutions and Revolutionaries : from,='  'anarchism to Zhou Enlai. New York: Facts on File. 1996.J&,=,W ,J4,W DJܿ,g,tYoung, Brigadier Peter, with Brigadier Michael Calvert. A Dictionary of Battles'  '17151815. Vol. 3. New York: Mayflower Books, 1979.,t,,,Young, Brigadier Peter, with Brigadier Michael Calvert. Dictionary of Battles18161976. Vol. 4. New York: Mayflower Books. 1978.,,,,$,,'  '$Academic Research Works Containing Compilations0,,,h'  '0,,Bodart, Gaston. Losses of Life in Modern Wars: AustriaHungary; France.Oxford: At the Clarendon Press. 1916. ,- --Bouthoul, Gaston, and Rene Carrere. A List of the 366 Major Armed Conflicts ofthe Period 17401974, Peace Research. Vol. 10, Number 3 (July 1978). pp. 83108. --* -*-7Dumas, Samuel, and K. O. VedelPetersen. Losses of Life Caused by War. Oxford:At the Clarendon Press. 1923. -7-Q-Q-^Farwell, Byron. Queen Victorias Little Wars. New York: W. W. Norton &Company. 1972.-^-x-x-Hassig, Ross. Aztec Warfare: Imperial Expansion and Political Control. Norman,OK: University of Oklahoma Press. 1988.----Holsti, Kalevi. J. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648  1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.----Holsti, Kalevi J. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 1996.----Jongman, Albert J. (Ed.). Contemporary Genocides: Causes, Cases,Consequences. Leiden, Netherlands: PIOOM. 1996.-...!Kende, Istvan, Wars from 1965 to 1978, Peace Research. Vol. 11, Number 4(October 1979). pp. 197199..!.;.;.HKiser, Edgar, Kriss A. Drass, and William Brustein. The Relationship BetweenRevolt and War in Early Modern Western Europe, Journal of Political andMilitary Sociology. Vol. 22, No. 2 (Winter 1994). pp. 305324..H.o.o.|Levy, Jack S. War in the Modern Great Power System, 19451975. Lexington, KT:the University Press of Kentucky. 1983..|...Luard, Evan. War in International Society: A Study in International Sociology.New Haven: Yale University Press. 1987... ..Richardson, Lewis F. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Pittsburgh: The BoxwoodPress. 1960.!.."..Rummel, R. J. Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder since 1917. NewBrunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 1990.J#./  .4/ DJܿ//(Rummel, R. J. Chinas Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder since 1900.'  'New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 1991./(/B/B/ORummel, R. J. Democide: Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder. New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers. 1992./O/i/i/vRummel, R. J. Death by Government. New Brunswick, NJ: TransactionPublishers. 1994./v///Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. Resort to Arms: International and CivilWars, 18161980. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 1982.// //Sorokin, Pitirim A. Social and Cultural Dynamics: Volume 3: Fluctuation ofSocial Relationships, War, and Revolution. New York: American Book Company.1937. // //Sutton, Antony. The State, War, and Revolution. (Unpublished manuscript).Probably 1972. /0 00Sutton, Antony. Wars and Revolutions in the Nineteenth Century. (Unpublishedmanuscript). 1972. 009 090FUrlanis, B. Wars and Population of Europe: human losses of the armed forces ofthe European countries in the XVIIXX century wars. Moscow: ProgressPublications. 1960. 0F0m0m0zWoods, Frederick Adams, and Alexander Baltzly. Is War Diminishing? A Studyof the Prevalence of War in Europe from 1450 to the Present Day. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company. 1915.0z000Wright, Quincy. A Study of War: Vol. 1. Second edition. Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1965.0000$00'  '$Historical Chronologies and Historical Atlases0000'  '000Ajaye, J. F. Ade, and Michael Crowder (general eds.). Historical Atlas of Africa.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.0111#Axelrod, Alan. Chronicle of the Indian Wars: From Colonial Times to WoundedKnee. New York: Konechy & Konecky. 1993.1#1=1=1JChannon, John, with Robert Hudson. The Penguin Historical Atlas of Russia.London: Penguin Books. 1995. 1J1d!1d1qFreemanGrenville, G.S.P. Chronology of African History. London: OxfordUniversity Press, 1973.#1q1 $11FreemanGrenville, G.S.P. Chronology of World History: a calender of principalevents from 3000 B.C. To A.D. 1973. London: Rex Collings, 1975.!&11J"'11 14'1 DJFreemanGrenville, G.S.P. Historical Atlas of the Middle East. New York: SimonShuster, 1993.$)11'  '$*11Gilbert, Martin. Atlas of Russian History. New York: Dorset Press. 1985.+12,22Grant, Neil. Chronicle of 20th Century Conflict. New York: SmithmarkPublishers. 1993..22*/2*27McEvedy, Colin. The Penguin Atlas of African History. London: Penguin Books.1995.1272Q22Q2^Natkiel, Richard, and John Pimlott. Atlas of Warfare. New York: Gallery Books.1988. 42^2x 52x2Pluvier, Jan M. Historical Atlas of SouthEast Asia. New York: E.J. Brill, 1995. 622 722Wilgus, A. Curtis. Historical Atlas of Latin America: political, geographic,economic, cultural. New York: Cooper Square Publishers, 1967. 922:22$;22'  '$Works Not in the English Language0<222'  '0=22History of Wars in China. (Zhongguo lidai zhanzheng shi). Vols. 1418. Taipei,Taiwan: United Military University of Taiwan. 1972. (in Chinese)?23@33Encyclopedia of Wars and Battles in and Outside of China. (Zhongwai zhanzhengzhanyi dacidian). Changsha, Hunan, PRC: Hunan Press. 1992. (in Chinese)B33.C3.3;Dictionary of Wars and Battles. (Zhongwai zhan dian). Beijing: Central NationalUniversity Press.1993. (in Chinese)E3;3UF3U3bWars & Incidents: Survey of All Wars, Coup Detats, and Incidents.(SensouJihen: ZensensouKuu Te TaaJihen Souran). Edited revised edition.Tokyo: Kyouikusha. 1993. (in Japanese)I3b3J33Notohisa, Yashida, (Ed.). Small Encyclopedic Overview of Japanese Wars.(Nihonshi SyohyakaSenran). Tokyo: Konto. 1984. (in Japanese)L33M33Bodart, Gaston. Lexicon of War and Military History (16181905). (Militaer  historisches KriegsLexicon). Vienna: C. W. Stern. 1908. (in German)O33P33Bouthoul, Gaston, and Rene Carrere. The Challenge of War,17401974. (Le defi dela guerre). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 1976. (in French)R33S34 Latsinsky, A. S. (Ed.) Chronology of the Global History of Wars with reference tothe major facts of sociopolitical and cultural history, 4400 BC 1900 AD. St.Petersburg: Military Printing House. 1901. (in Russian) V4 42!W424?Shavrov, I. E. (Ed.). Local Wars: History and Modern Times. Moscow: MilitaryPublishing House of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR.. 1981. (in Russian)"Y4?4Y$#Z4Y4f'  '$b$[4f4s4f 4f4[4s D'  'bOtherÿ0\444'  '0$]44'  '$ SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook of World Armaments and Disarmament, 1968/69. New4'  'York: Humanities Press. 1969._44`44SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook: World Armaments and Disarmament. New York:Humanities Press. 1986 to 1993 editions.b44c44SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security.New York: Humanities Press. 1994 to 1996 editions.e45$f55'  '$ Sivard, Ruth Leger. World Military and Social Expenditures. Leesburg, VA:5'  'WMSE Publications. 1985, 198788, 1991, 1993, 1996 editions. h55, i5,59Wallensteen, Peter, and Karin Axell. Armed Conflict at the End of the Cold War,198992, Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 30, No. 3. 1993. pp. 331346. k595S l5S5`Wallensteen, Peter, and Karin Axell. Conflict Resolution and the End of the ColdWar, 198993, Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 31, No. 3. 1994. pp. 333349. n5`5zo5z5Wallensteen, Peter, and Margareta Sollenberg. After the Cold War: EmergingPatterns of Armed Conflict 198994, Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 32, No. 3.1995. pp. 345360.r55 s55Wallensteen, Peter, and Margareta Sollenberg. The End of International War?Armed Conflict 198995, Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 33, No. 3. 1996. pp. 353  370.v55w55Wallensteen, Peter, and Margareta Sollenberg. Armed Conflicts, ConflictTermination, and Peace Agreements, 198996, Journal of Peace Research. Vol.34, No. 3. 1997. pp. 339358.$z56' '$ܳ!"Genevab{66&6 6 {6& D'  'bΪЫ#!"New Century Schlbk#BIBLIOGRAPHY0|666C66'  '0ܪЫ$}6C6P'  '$Blainey, Geoffrey. 1973. The Causes of War. New York: The Free Press.0~6P6]6P'  '06]6jBouthoul, Gaston, and Rene Carrere. 1978. A List of the 366 Major Armed'  'Conflicts of the Period 17401974, Peace Research. Vol. 10, Number 3 (July). pp.6wA'  '83108.6j666Brecke, Peter. 1997. Beyond Typologies: A Taxonomy of Violent Conflicts, Paperpresented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association,Toronto, March 1822.6666Brecke, Peter. 1998. Finding Harbingers of Violent Conflict: Using Pattern'  'Recognition to Anticipate Conflicts. Conflict Management and Peace Science.6'  'Vol. 16, No. 1 (Spring). pp. 3156. 66$ 67'  '$CioffiRevilla, Claudio. 1996. Origins and Evolution of War and Politics.7'  'International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 40, No. 1 (March). pp. 122.0 77 7'  '0$ 7 7-'  '$Eckhardt, William. 1992. Civilizations, Empires and Wars: A Quantitative History7-'  'of War. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.0 7-7G7:'  '0J$7G7T'  '$Geller, Daniel S. And J. David Singer. 1998. Nations at War: A Scientif Study of7T'  'International Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.07T7n7a+'  '0$7n7{'  '$ Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order7{E'  '16481989. New York: Cambridge University Press.07{77R'  '0$77'  '$ Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized7l'  'Interstate Disputes, 18161992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.7y'  'Conflict Management and Peace Science. Vol. 15, No. 2 (Fall). pp. 163213.0777'  '0$77'  '$Kende, Istvan. 1979. Wars from 1965 to 1978, Peace Research. Vol. 11, No. 47'  '(October). pp. 197199.$77'  '$ 0777'  '0Levy, Jack S. 1983. War in the Modern Great Power System, 14951975. Lexington,7'  'KY: The University Press of Kentucky.78$88$'  '$Luard, Evan. 1987. War in International Society: A Study in International8$'  'Sociology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.08$8>81'  '08>8KMidlarsky, Manus I. 1988. Theoretical Foundations for the Collection of Major'  'PowerMinor Power War Data. International Interactions. Vol. 14. pp. 187190.08K8e8X"'  '0$8e8r'  '$Midlarsky, Manus I. (Ed.). 1989. Handbook of War Studies. Ann Arbor, MI:8r<'  'University of Michigan Press.8r8$88'  '$ Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and8c'  'Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.0888p'  '0$ 88'  '$Richardson, Lewis F. 1960. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Edited by Quincy Wright8'  'and Carl C. Lienau. Pittsburgh: The Boxwood Press.J!88 848 DJܿ$88'  '$Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1972. The Wages of War, 18161965: A8 '  'Statistical Handbook. New York: Free Press.0899'  '0$99'  '$ Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil94'  'Wars, 18161980.  Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 09989+A'  '0$989E'  '$ Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1937. Social and Cultural Dynamics: Volume 3: Fluctuation of9E['  'Social Relationships, War, and Revolution. New York: American Book Company.09E9_9Rh'  '0$9_9l'  '$Sutton, Antony. 1972a. The State, War, and Revolution. (Unpublished9l'  'manuscript). 9l9$ 99'  '$Sutton, Antony. 1972b. Wars and Revolutions in the Nineteenth Century.9'  '(Unpublished manuscript). 99 99JJWallensteen, Peter, and Margareta Sollenberg. 1996. The End of International'  'War? Armed Conflict 198995. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 353 9'  ' 370. 99$ 99'  '$Wilkinson, David. 1980. Deadly Quarrels: Lewis F. Richardson and the Statistical9'  'Study of War. Berkeley: University of California Press.09:9'  '0$::'  '$Wright, Quincy. 1965. A Study of War: Vol. 1. Second edition. Chicago: University:+'  'of Chicago Press.